A ban has been proposed on discharging firearms for waterfowl hunting in the Grassy Point area of Superior, Wisconsin, according to the Superior Telegram. Once a popular hunting spot, the area is undergoing new development, prompting officials to consider it no longer suitable for hunting.

The recommendation was made on Oct. 16 by Jason Sereck, the city's planning, economic development, and port director. As reported by the Superior Telegram, he wrote in a memo to committee members that "the huntable area has been condensed."

Sereck also expressed concern for the safety of his workers, noting that more than 60 employees are assigned to work in the area.

Councilor Nicholas Ledin told the Superior Telegram that the ban makes sense since there are other areas where hunting waterfowl with firearms is still allowed.

Hunting in the region has been a practice since the 1750s, when French Canadian settlers arrived. It was once a method of survival; however, today it is primarily done for sport. 

While enjoyed by many, hunting can threaten species with extinction. The survival of waterfowl is essential to maintaining healthy ecosystems. When one species declines, it can trigger a cascade of effects that disrupt the entire ecological balance. When hunting is overdone, it becomes increasingly unsustainable. 

A hunting ban can also encourage more community use of the area, as safety concerns may have previously deterred visitors. It can also boost ecotourism and recreational opportunities that don't interfere with local biodiversity.

Additionally, conservation of wildlife allows future generations to enjoy the outdoors, boosting overall well-being.

Similar bans on hunting migratory birds are being enacted worldwide, as well as bans on hunting other animals, including bears and turtle doves. 

Conversely, some argue that regulated hunting does not disrupt ecological balance. They claim that such bans can instead lead to habitat loss, as developments are taking over these lands.

Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely 👍 Only in some areas ☝️ No way 👎 I'm not sure 🤷 Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.

On a Reddit thread, commenters shared their opinions on hunting. 

One user said, "I support hunting as long as it's not [an] endangered species."

Another comment read, "No, it shouldn't be illegal for invasive species."

Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.