Kim Kardashian's shapewear-centric SKIMS has come under fire for a number of reasons, but the brand's latest bid at virality — a piece of lingerie with a highly questionable design feature — confused and irritated social media users.
Kardashian's line offers girdle-like garments, sleep and loungewear, and various types of lingerie and daywear. The brand has introduced eye-popping designs to internet chagrin before, such as a "nipple bra" that was manufactured to mimic the effect of a sudden chill.
This time around, SKIMS skipped the top half and focused on undergarments, developing panties adorned with "faux hair," per Hindustan Times
The garment, which primarily consists of a tuft of synthetic hair and pieces of connecting elastic, is priced at $32 on the SKIMS website. Remarkably, most colorways of what the brand described as their "most daring panty yet" appeared to be sold out.
Unsurprisingly, users on Reddit's r/Anticonsumption weren't all that impressed by the attention-grabbing new piece, but neither did they know precisely what to think about it.

SKIMS has been accused of being a fast fashion mecca at premium prices, and the brand has also been criticized for its sustainability practices as well as alleged greenwashing.
Stay warm all winter long with the Apple of intelligent space heaters![]() Kelvin is the Apple of space heaters, designed for energy efficiency and maximum comfort. It's completely silent and intelligently controlled, with setup taking just 5 minutes. Built from premium materials like aluminum and glass, Kelvin works beautifully as a full-home heating system or as the perfect solution for that one room that never feels warm enough. |
Although $32 wasn't necessarily exorbitant for undergarments, users struggled to understand the purpose and utility of the piece — particularly one mimicking a form of natural body hair that most in the target demographic are routinely pressured to wax or groom.
"Um ... I don't understand. Why not just let your own hair grow out if you want [visible hair] so badly?" a user mused.
"Really odd to be recreating natural body features with undies like that to me, but who knows," a commenter replied, further describing the above-mentioned bras as "uncanny AF."
Ultimately, through the lens of needless consumption — an issue for which the Kardashian family could fairly be viewed as textbook examples — Reddit users found the concept of novelty undergarments wasteful and pointless.
TCD Picks » Stasher Spotlight
💡Stasher's reusable food storage options make it easy and affordable to live life with less plastic
"Wtf is this timeline[?] It's definitely cheaper to go braless. I've saved so much money over the years lol," a commenter admitted.
"Right? TMI, but I know from experience that you can go braless and grow [hair] with zero effort and zero money," another concurred.
|
How often do celebrity endorsements affect your decision to buy a product? Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. |
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.








