• Business Business

Supreme Court hears Louisiana's 13-year-old lawsuit against major industry: 'This is such a massive deal'

Public reaction mostly reflects cautious optimism.

The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing whether Louisiana's lawsuits against oil companies should be tried in state or federal court.

Photo Credit: iStock

The U.S. Supreme Court is now weighing whether Louisiana's lawsuits against oil companies should be tried in state or federal court. Its ruling could set a precedent on how cases regarding environmental damages are handled nationwide.

On January 12, 2026, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a procedural dispute over the proper jurisdiction for a lawsuit that Louisiana coastal parishes filed against Chevron. The ruling — expected by June — could affect other similar lawsuits winding through state courts for over a decade, Reuters reported.

Louisiana coastal parishes have filed multiple cases against oil and gas companies for violating state environmental laws by failing to obtain permits and dumping wastewater into wetlands. The state is seeking billions of dollars to fund coastal restoration and cleanup efforts.

Chevron has asked that the cases be moved to federal court, arguing that some of the activities cited in the lawsuits "relate to" federal work. However, critics see this request as a move to avoid perceived local prejudice and reduce the huge financial risk posed by sympathetic state courts.

In 2025, a Louisiana jury ruled against Chevron in one lawsuit and ordered the oil giant to pay $744.6 million for wetlands restoration in one parish. With more than 40 lawsuits filed against oil companies, similar adverse rulings can lead to significant financial consequences.

During oral arguments, several justices, both liberal and conservative, have questioned how broadly the phrase "relating to" can be interpreted. One justice even warned against a butterfly effect where almost anything could be loosely tied to federal work. These sentiments may favor Louisiana and other local governments seeking to enforce their own environmental laws.

If the Supreme Court sides with Louisiana — as it did with a previous similar case — it could make it easier for states and local governments to hold oil corporations accountable for long-term environmental harm.

According to a study published in Nature, 50% of the increase in heatwave intensity globally is linked to large oil and gas companies, including Chevron and ExxonMobil. This helps explain why community pressure around this case remains high and why exploring critical climate issues and taking local action is important.

Public reaction mostly reflects cautious optimism.

"Surely the fair and balanced U.S. Supreme Court will have utmost consideration for the regular citizens over the big oil companies," a Reddit user commented on the r/Louisiana subreddit.

Do you think America has a plastic waste problem?

Definitely 👍

Only in some areas 🫤

Not really 👎

I'm not sure 🤷

Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.

Another boldly criticized oil giants, writing: "Still hell-bent on ruining more environmental spaces for greed."

"That's why this is such a massive deal for the state of Louisiana," Louisiana Solicitor General Ben Aguinaga said regarding the case against Chevron, per Reuters.

Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips to save more, waste less, and make smarter choices — and earn up to $5,000 toward clean upgrades in TCD's exclusive Rewards Club.

Cool Divider