• Tech Tech

Experts debunk viral claim about wind turbines — here's what the post got wrong

Experts and industry representatives are calling this a massive exaggeration.

Experts and industry representatives are calling this a massive exaggeration.

Photo Credit: iStock

Wind turbines are central to the clean energy landscape, but a recently shared debunked claim on social media has spurred questions about just how resource-intensive they are to build. 

In a viral Facebook video, former University of Melbourne geology professor Ian Plimer incorrectly alleged that a single wind turbine requires a staggering 33,000 tons of both concrete and iron ore. Experts and industry representatives are calling this a massive exaggeration — by a factor of 10 or even more. 

It is important to note that Plimer has served as the director of at least three mining companies, which has enriched him and could explain his stances.

So, how much of these resources do wind turbines actually need? Industry data paints a much more sustainable picture. A typical 6.2-megawatt wind turbine, for example, requires roughly 2,700 tons of concrete and 1,300 tons of iron ore — less than a 10th of the amounts claimed in the video. 

This is supported by numerous experts, including energy researcher Mark Diesendorf, who pointed out that these figures are consistent with the findings of major manufacturers like Vestas and Acciona Energy. 

Wind turbines are a net positive in energy production. Numerous studies show that turbines typically offset the energy used to build them within a year, with even conservative estimates, such as this Texas study, placing the payback period just under six years. Modern designs and optimal placement enhance efficiency, reinforcing wind power as a continued clean energy solution. 

Setting the record straight is crucial, as misinformation like this can skew public perception of clean energy. While wind turbines do require raw materials for construction, their environmental benefits far outweigh their initial footprints

Unlike coal plants, which continuously burn dirty fuel, turbines harness the wind — producing clean, cheap energy for decades with minimal pollution. 

The post also misses another key point: innovation. Manufacturers are continuously refining designs to reduce material use and improve efficiency. As Professor Andrew Blakers from The Australian National University explained, claims like Plimer's often confuse the requirements for an entire wind farm with those of a single turbine, leading to unnecessary alarm. 

Do you think governments should ban gas stoves?

Heck yes! 💯

Only in new buildings 🏢

Only in restaurants 🍔

Heck no! 🙅

Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.

Clean energy plays a critical role in reducing pollution and promoting energy independence, and wind power is one of the most scalable and sustainable options we have. By focusing on facts and pushing back against myths, we can better understand the role technologies like wind turbines play in building a cleaner, healthier future.

Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Cool Divider