• Tech Tech

California council eyes guardrails after HOA installs 4 plate-reader cameras in neighborhood

"It's mass surveillance, and I think we need guardrails around that."

A Flock safety camera mounted on a pole against a cloudy sky.

Photo Credit: iStock

A homeowners association in Brentwood, California, has drawn backlash for placing four license plate reader cameras at the entrances and exits of the Shadow Lake housing development.

Although the cameras were framed as a security measure, some residents say they did not expect them and are now raising questions about who can see the footage, how long the data is kept, and whether a private neighborhood should collect that type of information in the first place, KGO-TV reported.

Here's what to know

At the center of the dispute are four Flock cameras that the Shadow Lake HOA claims it commissioned in response to reports of crime and theft in the neighborhood. 

Privacy concerns surfaced during the conversation when the matter reached a Brentwood City Council meeting.

Brentwood resident Anthony Carmona told the station he did not know what the devices were until he asked about them.

"I asked him, 'Hey, what are these things?' Cause I noticed they were popping up all over. He said, 'Oh, these are license plate readers,'" Carmona recalled.

For many residents, the bigger complaint was not simply that the cameras went up, but that they say clear notice did not come first.

"I wasn't too happy about it, because I hadn't heard about it," Carmona added.

Michele Spring-Fajeau of Brentwood agreed, describing the Flock cameras as an overreaction. 

"I think my initial instinct was, it's unnecessary. I understand it's meant for protecting and providing additional safety, but we didn't receive any information on what it was and what its intentions were," Spring-Fajeau commented.

The HOA maintained that it alerted homeowners through surveys, newsletters, open forums, and posts on the community website. 

It also claimed that management alone administers the system and that the data it captures is kept for only 30 days.

More background

The debate is part of a broader tension playing out in neighborhoods across the country: how much authority HOAs should have over daily life inside private communities.

In this area, the issue is surveillance. 

In other cases, HOAs have faced criticism for blocking homeowners from making money-saving upgrades, such as installing rooftop solar or switching to native-plant lawns.

The Shadow Lake HOA said security has been a long-running issue and, according to KGO-TV, annual spending on 24-hour roving patrols was about $300,000. 

The association also indicated that it later cut one of the three patrol shifts to save money after checking with police on the hours when crime was least active.

That said, some people in the community are still uncomfortable with a private group keeping data that tracks vehicle movements.

"I don't know that it's appropriate for private entities to have that information up front," Brentwood resident Soren Fajeau told KGO-TV.

What's being done?

Councilmember Jovita Mendoza said she is looking into the matter, and the Brentwood City Council is expected to revisit potential rules for privately owned Flock cameras.

Anyone navigating disputes over neighborhood rules can check out our resource on working with HOAs, especially those involving major property decisions.

"It's mass surveillance, and I think we need guardrails around that," Mendoza observed.

Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.

Cool Divider