A proposed multiyear pay package for the head of Texas' power grid operator has been put on hold after Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick publicly criticized it. The dispute raises new questions about accountability as households continue to face higher electricity bills.
Documents tied to a proposed deal for Electric Reliability Council of Texas President and CEO Pablo Vegas indicated his compensation could climb to $6.4 million in 2027. After Patrick objected publicly, Vegas said the agreement will not be carried out.
Here's what to know
During ERCOT's regular board meeting, the grid operator's directors and the Public Utility Commission backed a six-year extension for Vegas, The Texas Tribune reported.
Patrick then said on social media that he had instructed both agency chairs to "immediately reverse their action" and said, "During a time of increasing utility costs, this is not the time to give the CEO of ERCOT a multi-million-dollar pay raise on the backs of ratepayers."
Vegas later told the Tribune that he will stay on his existing agreement through 2027 because the newly approved contract won't be signed. He also said the board never took a separate vote to formally undo its earlier approval.
Much of the confusion centered on the difference between compensation that could be "earned" in a given year and compensation actually "paid" in that year.
A public presentation showed more than $6.4 million in "potential earned compensation" for 2027, including base salary, bonuses, and long-term incentives.
Vegas said the presentation was "confusing to anyone who looked at it" and argued that the most he actually could have been paid in 2027 under the proposed agreement was about $4.1 million.
More background
Most of ERCOT's funding comes from an administrative charge billed to retail electric providers and municipal utilities, a cost that is generally passed on to customers.
ElectricChoice data indicates average statewide power prices have risen by about 40% since 2020, increasing from 11.50 cents per kilowatt-hour to 16.11 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2026.
ERCOT is also unfolding amid heavy strain and political pressure on the grid operator. This includes rising demand, new data centers connecting to the system, transmission congestion, and the continuing fallout from the February 2021 winter storm disaster that left millions without power and killed hundreds of people.
Vegas, who was hired in 2022 after former CEO Bill Magness was fired in the wake of that crisis, received $3.6 million in compensation in 2024, according to ERCOT's 990 form filed in late 2025, cited by the Tribune.
What's being done?
Vegas said the board's actions still signaled support for extending his contract in the future, but the backlash appears to have forced a pause.
As The Texas Tribune reported, ERCOT cut its administration fee from $0.63 to $0.61 per megawatt-hour, though that reduction is minor compared with the broader jump in electricity costs facing residents.
"The actions taken today by the board show the support for eventually getting this contract finalized," Vegas said. "They chose not to finalize it today. Clearly there's an opportunity to clear up what was meant by this contract, and everyone would be well served understanding that better."
Where can I learn more?
Here are stories about a California salmon spill, disputes over greenwashing by natural gas and oil companies, policy efforts to curb misleading claims, and rising emissions at a major retailer.
• In California, conservationists say an overlooked environmental disaster at PG&E devastated Butte Creek salmon.
• In Oregon, NW Natural faced scrutiny after deceiving lawmakers and residents about so-called renewable gas.
• TotalEnergies is facing a major lawsuit over claims it misled customers about fossil fuels.
• In the U.S. and EU, officials are weighing policy responses to greenwashing by companies.
• Inditex, Zara's parent company, drew backlash after a concerning operational change coincided with higher emissions.
Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.







