The digital streaming platform Roku offers no shortage of content, with hundreds of channels available to browse. But one recent addition has drawn backlash.
Fairground AI Creator TV, a channel devoted entirely to programming that has been generated using artificial intelligence, has turned many curious viewers into critics, as detailed by SlashGear.
Here's what to know
Roku added Fairground AI Creator TV in early August. It operates as a round-the-clock stream of AI-generated films, TV series, and other projects, with commercials created using AI as well.
SlashGear reported that roughly 100 digital creators have been developing AI prompts for Fairground, though it remains unclear how much the creators are paid. The channel comes from Colin Petrie-Norris, founder of streaming service Xumo, who told Variety that the team would be creating "gorgeous things" by pairing a "traditional viewing pattern" with new technology.
Much of the public reaction has been harsh, however, with a review from Slate describing the content as "robotic," "uncanny," and "disconcerting." BGR called the AI channel "even worse than it sounds."
The criticism has focused not just on the use of AI, but on the quality of the output. According to SlashGear, viewers have pointed to visuals that feel disjointed, dialogue that does not match mouth movements, and scenes that seem to ignore basic physics.
TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight
💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all
More background
Many critics see generative AI as a shortcut that reduces labor costs while stripping creativity of the human perspective that makes it meaningful, sometimes even stealing from original human-created work.
This frustration has only grown as AI has become more closely linked to layoffs and job disruptions in creative and technological industries. To some viewers, a full-time AI TV channel feels less like a novelty and more like another sign that low-cost automated content is spreading into every corner of life.
AI can be used to help society in important ways, such as improving disease diagnosis and treatment, upgrading forecasts, and optimizing clean energy systems on the power grid. At the same time, training and running AI models can require huge amounts of electricity and water, while also raising concerns about quality, security, labor impacts, and increased utility demands that could push energy costs higher while straining resources.
What can be done?
Streaming platforms and tech companies could be more transparent about how AI-generated content is made, how workers are compensated, and what safeguards are in place to prevent misleading, low-quality, or plagiarized programming from flooding their services.
If AI is going to continue to play a part in art and entertainment, audiences and workforces will likely keep pushing for stronger standards and regulations.
Companies could also honor customer feedback and decline to produce AI-generated content altogether. The backlash around Roku's new channel suggests many viewers are not convinced the tech is ready or even desired.
Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.
