After years of routine use, one pet owner said an indoor camera update turned playback of recorded footage into a subscription feature.
They said the device, which they mainly used to check on their cats, did little beyond showing a live feed.
Here's what to know
In a Reddit thread, the owner said the camera's live stream still worked. The bigger change, they told the r/mildlyinfuriating subreddit, was that after an update, the app now required a paid subscription to watch clips the camera had recorded, despite years of prior use.
The poster said the camera was never meant to replace a dedicated security setup. They said they originally got it to check on their cats after a move while they spent a lot of time at the office and later noted it was mostly aimed at a "cat chair."
That meant the frustration wasn't about a newly purchased gadget arriving broken, but about a familiar device losing a function the owner had used for years.
Reaction in the comments was sharp.
TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight
💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all
One person called the change "a blatant cash grab," while another said, "It's a bait and switch."
More background
The replies also broadened into a discussion about storage and dependence on subscriptions. One commenter asked whether the camera used local storage or relied entirely on the cloud, saying they avoid products that stop working if "the manufacturer decides not to keep its end running."
The original poster then tried the SD-card route. They said formatting and inserting a card made the app appear to save footage, but attempting to open those recordings still produced a subscription prompt. The poster added that "for some reason it's even more expensive when it's saving on and SD card."
In situations like that, a camera may still capture video but become much less practical if the app limits access to recordings unless the owner pays.
Privacy concerns surfaced as well. Responding to those comments, the poster updated their initial post to say they understood the worries about internet-connected cameras inside a home and reiterated that theirs was pointed at the cat chair and that there were no kids in the house.
What can be done?
Instead of paying for the new plan, the original poster said they would rather replace the camera with one that does not charge a recurring fee for basic playback.
Other commenters said a move like that would mean "an immediate unplug and maybe sell, if it becomes useless without a subscription."
One synthesized the lesson of the experience: "Everyone needs to stop supporting this behavior that's the only way these companies will learn."
The original poster also laid out their plans for the future.
"I would rather buy a different camera that isn't subscription based than pay to support that s****," they concluded.
Where can I learn more?
Home cameras raise more than questions about subscriptions. They can raise privacy concerns and capture bad behavior.
• A homeowner used security footage to catch an HOA stomp through a garden.
• One neighbor's grass-height surveillance setup intensified fears about invasive monitoring in the neighborhood.
Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.
