A controversial tool designed to help police solve crimes is also showing how easily surveillance systems can be misused.
In Georgia, reviews of Flock Safety search records surfaced improper access by officers and civilian employees, resulting in suspensions, firings, and criminal charges.
What happened?
According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Flock Safety has a self-audit feature that identifies searches that do not fit an agency's usual activity. Georgia law enforcement departments have been using that process to review activity in the company's license plate reader system, which allows investigators to see where roadside cameras captured vehicles.
That review process has led to internal investigations. In DeKalb County, police said a check identified eight employees for possible policy violations. After the allegations were confirmed, they were suspended.
The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has also brought charges in several alleged misuse cases tied to agencies in Polk County, Rockdale County, Richmond County, Habersham County, and the Ogeechee Judicial Circuit.
Flock Safety's website, as the AJC reported, says the Atlanta-based company has a network of more than 120,000 cameras in 49 states and produces about 20 billion scans a month.
TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight
💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all
Why does it matter?
License plate readers are often framed by officials as efficient public safety tools that can help recover stolen cars, locate suspects, and support investigations. However, when access is abused, the same powerful technology can become an invasion of privacy and lead to surveillance of innocent civilians.
Commuting to work, dropping kids off at school, visiting a doctor, attending a religious service, or seeing friends can all become part of a searchable record. Even if only one employee misuses the system, it can still leave communities wondering who is watching them and why.
People are less likely to support useful technology when safeguards are weak. Widespread surveillance without strong oversight risks normalizing privacy violations and destroying public confidence.
The controversy is also reaching governments. In Dunwoody, concerns over Flock contracts and surveillance practices drew residents to City Council meetings, reflecting an unease about how much data police should be able to collect and search.
TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight
💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all
What's being done?
Flock Safety says its audit tool looks for search behavior that falls outside an agency's normal patterns, giving departments a way to review suspicious access and decide whether action is needed.
Some agencies say they are pairing that technology with internal compliance checks. "Regular audits of system usage are conducted to ensure compliance with department policy, identify potential misuse, and take appropriate corrective action when violations occur," the DeKalb County Police Department said in a statement, per the AJC.
As Habersham County Sheriff Robin Krockum wrote in a Facebook post, "Although the choice of this deputy casts a bad light on the use of this technology, Flock continues to be a valuable tool for law enforcement that has been proven to save lives."
Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.
