• Home Home

Drivers say mandated 'safety' gas cans drip on hands, trap fuel, and make a bigger mess

"I hated these at first, but the more I got used to it the more I hated it."

A hand holds a red gas can with a black spout and green nozzle against a light background.

Photo Credit: Reddit

Complaints about redesigned gas cans are at the center of a sarcastic Reddit post arguing that products sold as safety upgrades can be more aggravating and messier than the older versions.

The criticism focuses on what users describe as awkward mechanisms that can leave gasoline on their hands, keep some fuel from pouring out, and make routine refueling harder than it should be.

Here's what to know

Posted in the r/mildlyinfuriating forum, the post's author described newer cans as "new and improved danger bottles" and said they had "so many moving parts that it continuously dripped gas all over my hand as I was using it." 

A hand holds a red gas can with a black spout and green nozzle against a light background.
Photo Credit: Reddit

The author also complained that "no matter which way I tilted it, there was about a quarter cup of gas still left in the can."

"I hated these at first, but the more I got used to it the more I hated it," one commenter quipped.

A different commenter said a can used for mowing would "spill or drip gas all over the side of the mower," adding that pouring "straight out of the can" made less of a mess. 

Another user sarcastically asked: "Who doesn't like getting some splashback all over themselves in the name of safety?"

More background

Gasoline is already a high-risk household product, and ease of use matters. The original poster mocked the design. 

"I thought the simple currogated tube was always too simple, safe and easy to understand," they assessed.

The OP also poked holes at the idea that Texans wouldn't already be careful with gas, and fully aware it is a volatile fluid. In that light, they said the redesign made it harder to be safe.

"I want them to be frustrated too, to encourage reckless, impulsive behavior," they wrote. "If it's too simple they may actually be safe! Nobody wants that!"

Another commenter identified a separate concern with the design.

"The inability to completely empty the can is the most concerning part of this." they wrote. "Anybody that knows anything about how gas works knows that a mostly empty can is a lot more dangerous than a full one."

What's being done?

In the replies, some commenters pointed to workarounds such as older-style funnels and replacement spouts.

"I bought a different spout years ago and have been much happier," a user wrote. "Just have to use common sense and can't be careless."

Other commenters said they bypass the nozzle entirely, while another suggested buying "race gas" cans. The thread was universally in favor of finding ways to avoid the system as designed.

Where can I learn more?

The Reddit complaints line up with a wider backlash to modern gas-can hardware and the rules meant to make gasoline handling safer. 

• Across the US, drivers say new-style gasoline containers are so awkward that spilling feels inevitable.

• Many owners now turn to retrofit conversion kits when factory spouts waste fuel.

A design marketed as safer can still frustrate users when it makes basic refueling more complicated. Regulators and consumers are still locked in a tug-of-war over what practical fuel safety should look like.

Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.

Cool Divider