Online commenters piled on after a voter shared an "I voted" sticker that looked as if it had been spat out by an image generator, as it contained classic AI hallmarks like a distorted eagle seal and nonsensical lettering people read as "FVEZDOM."
Many people objected to more than just the sloppy design, emphasizing how the low-effort AI sticker undermined the significance of an important civic duty.
What commenters said
Posted to Reddit's r/mildlyinfuriating, the image showed an eagle-and-shield "I voted" sticker riddled with apparent mistakes. People in the comments highlighted warped text, odd seal elements, and other features they took as telltale image-generation glitches.
"I just hate how everyone uses it as a crutch," the original poster wrote of image-generation technology. "Even if it's the easiest thing in the world to put the U.S. seal with a couple of words on a sticker."
Much of the thread's mockery centered on the sticker's unreadable wording. In a portion of the seal that seemed intended to read, "Celebrating Freedom," there instead appeared a blurred mishmash of letter-like symbols.
"You must hate FVEZDOM," one commenter wrote, mocking the image's apparent spelling of "Freedom."
TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight
💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all
Meanwhile, another user read the confusing text as "Celepating FVEZDCM."
More from the comments
Several commenters compared the low-effort AI image to other "I voted" stickers that encouraged civic learning and engagement.
"Mine was a crappy drawing from a five-year-old who won that year's contest," said one commenter. "I love it dearly."
"Mine is from a middle schooler this year," said another Redditor. "I think that's fun; have the kiddos do it and have them learn more about voting and civic duties!"
While some voters kept their "I voted" stickers as mementos of past elections, others did not understand their significance. One commenter said they usually "just slap my sticker on something or give it to the kids."
The controversy surrounding AI-generated images
As making realistic-looking AI images has become faster and cheaper, the controversy surrounding them has also grown. Many AI skeptics have expressed concern that AI will take away jobs from graphic designers, illustrators, photographers, actors, and others. Additionally, as the massive data centers that power AI models proliferate, concerns over their electricity use and water consumption have become more acute.
While AI has the potential to yield considerable benefits in areas such as electrical grid optimization, medical research, and business, these must be weighed against the technology's costs. As with any new technology, when it comes to AI, it is important to maximize the positives while minimizing the downsides and managing the inherent risks.
Where can I learn more?
The reaction to this sticker echoed a widespread irritation with AI-generated visuals. The following stories involved frustration with garbled images, discomfort with synthetic media, and bigger concerns about where the technology is going.
• Online users mocked AI's take on left-handed people after it mangled a basic everyday detail.
• People grew alarmed as AI fake movie posters spread online with increasingly unsettling details.
• At Christie's, completely AI-created art drew backlash from people questioning what was being celebrated.
• A new startup's AI simulations of loved ones left many people unnerved rather than impressed.
• At a global summit, leaders warned an engine of inequality could emerge around AI.
Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.
