A major utility spending plan in Illinois is drawing pushback, with consumer advocates warning that customers could be left paying for costly overruns.
With the Illinois Commerce Commission set to rule in October, the fight over Ameren Illinois' $2.8 billion grid plan is emerging as a flashpoint over who should bear the risk when utility projects go over budget.
What's happening?
As Advantage News reported, Ameren Illinois' proposal is being challenged by the Citizens Utility Board, which wants regulators to closely examine both the company's planned grid spending and its requested rate increase.
The consumer watchdog is also urging electricity customers to sign petitions asking state officials to hold Ameren accountable.
At the center of CUB's case is its estimate that Ameren's $2.8 billion grid proposal could run about $300 million over what it should cost, an overage the group warns could end up on customers' bills.
In the watchdog's view, that means the company is asking for more than it should.
TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight
💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all
Another point of contention is the use of so-called "reconciliation" cases, which CUB says could let the utility spend beyond an approved budget and later seek to recover the difference from customers.
According to CUB spokesman Jim Chilsen, Ameren should have to demonstrate that it weighed lower-cost options before moving ahead with major projects.
Why does it matter?
If a company is allowed to overspend and then recover those costs from customers, families can end up paying more each month even though they had no say in the decisions that drove the higher bill.
Utilities often argue that major grid investments are necessary, but consumer advocates say those projects should still face close scrutiny when customers are on the hook.
TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight
💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all
Such cases can shape expectations for future projects. If regulators allow one utility to pass along overruns too easily, it can signal that cost discipline is negotiable.
What's being done?
An order from ICC judges is expected in October as the Illinois Commerce Commission reviews the plan. That ruling will determine whether Ameren can proceed on its current terms or whether regulators will require changes.
CUB is seeking cost cuts that it says would keep customers from shouldering the burden of overspending. Through its challenge, the group is also pressing for tougher requirements on what Ameren must show before added costs can be passed through.
As the case heads toward an October decision, the dispute turns on whether customers should have to cover utility overruns they did not create.
From CUB's perspective, Ameren should face tougher scrutiny and show that it examined lower-cost options before Illinois families are asked to pay more.
Get TCD's free newsletters for easy tips, smart advice, and a chance to earn $5,000 toward home upgrades. To see more stories like this one, change your Google preferences here.
